free hit counters

American Five-sided Pyramid (continuation)

CHAPTER 22

AMERICAN FIVE-SIDED PYRAMID (continuation)

Since this research (I have a feeling) is leading towards new cognitions on this Mother Earth of ours that is still congested with secrets; secrets which could, like all other discoveries be useful for future generations, I have decided to give my support in such an endeavor to a man, an American researcher doing research in America itself, with just one thought on my mind, a thought in the form of a question: Am I really going to passively let another fellow extra-institutional loner stay lost in the bulk of those who unfortunately contribute no worthy results to civilization just because the “academic” who bring the decisions find such results undesirable, wondering “what do these outsiders want among us?”… I can best judge this in my own case on the example of the ordinary trisection of an angle (published on this web site for who knows how many times) where here in my own homeland, the learned avoided me as soon as the trisection issue was mentioned, or as folks say “avoided me like the plague”… let alone that any of them would dare write a review for my book for fear that they might thereby lose their academic title.

But, let’s put this aside and take a look at what we have on the “desk”. Four drawings. Rectilinear. One can see that it is exceptionally difficult to dismiss the deep-rooted “heritage” of rectilinear drawing, since to this very day the kids in school only draw the ordinary basic – triangle – by the use of straight lines (which I will deal with in one of my next chapters… I hope). However, it is indeed logical that it is hard to see the “invisible”. And the invisible is the “background” of the ancient constellations of spherical drawing, although it is difficult to comprehend that in essence these constellations are tridimensional (they are hard to understand even on paper) let alone even harder to interpret “in the field” because there the background is not exhibited and this could lead to errors, wrong impressions, wrong conclusions. Perhaps that is why I am still under the first impression of the American five-sided pyramid or maybe under the effect of the shots I saw of planet Mars, because they were similar to the first pattern that I received.

And now new, “in the field” data (though in a half-finished state), has reached me. The first images are the data received (figures number 1, 2, 3 and 4). Ancient geometry will come to our aid (only using the compass and unmarked straightedge) in our attempt to grasp what the “creator” wanted to “hide” for some other generation. We will follow the received (figures number 1, 2, 3 and 4) to try to “break the silence” and find out why they emerged and how we can get access to what the “hidden”.

All this will perhaps help the researcher in adding a few pieces of stone to the mosaic of his site “in the field” and thereby to reach the goal that he has been dissipating his time on for 17 years of his pioneering search. So, we will start from the first image … an unusual “Star of David” … an apparently illogical hexagonal star-shaped polygon and its “frame”.

* * *

Figure # 1: Unusual hexagonal star-shaped polygon – framed.

* * *

Figure # 2 : Unusual constellation of equilateral triangles with their heights.

* * *

Figure # 3: Following reference (to ancient Egyptian geometry – As above, so below), an attempt of a rectilinear solution.

* * *

Figure # 4: Second attempt and my first impression (dotted lines) but … I know that it doesn’t go that way in ancient geometry. …

* * *

According to figure # 1: Modified hexagonal star-shaped rectilinear polygon. Two equilateral triangles. Repositioned center.

* * *

We start with line segments in order to locate figure’s center and then we extend the line segments.

* * *

With the implementation of ancient geometrical knowledge, from the center we circumscribe the vertices of the triangles (closer to center) with full circles. The division with circles is in line with the horizontal diameter of frame and the basic circle (floral pattern) creates a correct star polygon of the line segment sides of the triangle – to which we add baselines..

* * *

Its internal hexagon is divided two more times and within it a third hexagon is formed. This is a border that is identical to the triangles in figure # 3. Therefore, this gives us a hint that we are dealing with a system of ancient geometry – but only in fragments, yet easily perceived by persons who “speak” the “language” of ancient geometry.

* * *

Therefore, we “invoke” as a background the universal “Flower of Life” artifact which is the basic coding system of geometry, namely the so-called “angelical” system of spherical geometry in its horizontal form (the system can also be observed if we turn the figure around by 90°).

* * *

We horizontally add to the frame its rectangular sides, all the rectilinear parts of their extended line segments so as to set up new intersections. The external circles of the “flower of life” already intersect the sides of the frame’s line segments and thereby create a part of the image as described in the field. We can now look for other missing elements. We omit the “reality” of the frame (cube) ratio of numbers 4 and 5 (for the time being), and by means of intersections we look for other elements fragmentally sent from the site.

* * *

By using circles and line segments we acquired series of full elements from figures 1, 2, 3 and 4. Hence, we now know for certain that somebody who “spoke” the language of ancient geometry left these “one-piece” markings on the site, believing that someone will know how to complete them (the megaliths were brought to this region). But why undertake such an exertion if they are of no importance?

* * *

If we somewhat clarify the figure, we generate something on the site that is under the ground… something that has a strictly an ancient geometry relationship of numbers 3 and 5 (the dotted line presentation of the relatedness of sides – a sacred relatedness in ancient times) and within that relationship lies the “heart” of it all – namely, the answer. And all of it is once more under the “key” of the duplicated star-shaped polygon popularly known as the “Star of David”. The problem that now remains is how to unlock it, i.e. how to determine on the surface the entry to the underground, because from a geometrical aspect it certainly exists! Perhaps Mister X who is “in the field” can help. By turning the figure around by 90° could make it easier… or perhaps (the next time) the relatedness of the radius and circumference on the basic, first circle.

* * * *

AFTERWORD TO PART TWO

It is arduous to geometrically research fragmental data in the field, but on the other hand it isn’t all that hard when compared to years of research work of a man, an ordinary citizen of the continent who spends his time and money on something that his pioneering spirit tells him that it might be of vital importance for civilization, and what is that when compared to the centuries that may have passed and the exertions of those who have left clues for us in the future (upon realization that their findings were not for their own times) but they did know that one day a genetic code will “start working” in someone in whom all of this is “written”. I wonder why a part of all of this happened to “discover” me, and what kind of “connectedness” do I have with America, a thread that I think is of no importance. Namely, my great grandfather from my father’s side of the family was a builder of the railroads in America. To this very day his descendants carry my family name, somewhere in Ohio (maybe)… because our connections were broken in the course of the last century. But for all this such a connection is too close; or could this be because of my devotion to antiquity, based again on my deep reverence to the somebody or something who or which, by way of some other people, gave us the guidelines for our western culture and beyond, on Mount Sinai more than three thousand years ago. I don’t know. But I only know that it was worth it, even if arduous, because a complete artifact speaks incessantly. The road from door to door is not so hard. But fragments are another story, and this can be confirmed by any researcher in any field of science. And one often encounters “blind alleys” and it isn’t easy to start all over from the beginning. Nevertheless I think it worthwhile to publish these pages as well, so that the interested readers will comprehend how much more remains to be discovered in all the fields of the natural sciences. Perhaps they might comprehend the need to undertake a “revision” of all knowledge, from the distant past to the present day. Had this been done a long time ago, today everyone would have their own power plants; or if one had carefully studied Archimedes, there would no longer be hunger in the world; or an attentive study of the Law of Moses would make us understand and recognize our image in a mirror as mortals of the youngest genus (evolutionary) in the known universe, etc. etc. And what else ties me to the continent which I have never seen? Something tells me, regardless of the moment that now prevails, that the greatest discoveries for the welfare of civilization will happen in America, and I am not judging this solely because of the continent’s technological possibilities, but because of something else: a tradition of habit. And habits are toughest to eradicate, and America – traditionally being the youngest, is in the best position as the most fruitful soil for the “European seeds”, therefore free of the centuries-old traditional habits – Tesla himself and many others as an example. However I’ll leave this subject for some other time, but right now I rest assured that the “five-sided American pyramid” and its originator is an American, a man of a different spirit, who will achieve his goal – his discovery.

Author: Tomo Periša
Translated by: S.F. Drenovac
Web Master: Slim

HR – RIJEKA, 10th April, 2012

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: suv | Thanks to trucks, infiniti suv and toyota suv